![]() |
| Author | Message |
Stasha
476 posts |
#22363 2007-09-14 03:25 GMT |
|
history of mona lisa and her smile?
|
|
Jordan
45 posts |
#22364 2007-09-14 03:28 GMT |
|
She has no lips. LOOK
|
|
Sarah
54 posts |
#22365 2007-09-14 03:30 GMT |
|
I'd say its just a hype popularized by the powers-that-be during those times.
|
|
VanGogh
49 posts |
#22366 2007-09-14 03:30 GMT |
|
because it is very beautiful! doesnt it?
|
|
JustMe
32 posts |
#22367 2007-09-14 03:30 GMT |
|
i think it is because if look into her smile you cant identify if smiling or she want to cry
|
|
BabyDoll
44 posts |
#22368 2007-09-14 03:30 GMT |
|
If i remember correctly; its because whatever section of her face that you look at, she gives a different impression. for example the right half of her face might show a different feeling than the left side of her face. happy/sad etc.
|
|
God
35 posts |
#22369 2007-09-14 03:32 GMT |
|
I wish i could honestly answer that but i dont really see the reason why its so famous. There are so many more things in the Louvre that are more magnificant in my mind. Its small the size of a sheet of paper really. Dont get me wrong its a wonderful painting but its overhyped in my mind. But there is something mysterious about that smile and the fact that he just saw her and wanted to paint her because of her beauty is just unheard of in that day.
|
|
LadyWoman
36 posts |
#22370 2007-09-14 03:32 GMT |
|
It is famous because it was painted by a famous man -Leonardo Davinci - who was already famous as an inventor at the time. The smile is unique because noone can prove she is smiling or smirking -it's hard to tell what her emotion is -it makes the portrait more complex.
|
|
NoOne
42 posts |
#22371 2007-09-14 03:33 GMT |
|
Can't you tell?? She just eased one out...
|
|
Dex
29 posts |
#22372 2007-09-14 03:33 GMT |
|
She seems to be watching you, no matter where you look at it from. Her eyes supposedly followed you
|
|
MagicStick
43 posts |
#22373 2007-09-14 03:34 GMT |
|
It is considered by many to be Leonardo's magnum opus (great work).
It has been suggested that Leonardo created more than one version of the painting. The owners of the version known as the Isleworth Mona Lisa claim that it is an original, though the great majority of art historians reject its authenticity. The same claim has been made for a version in the Vernon collection. Another version, dating from c.1616 was given in c.1790 to Joshua Reynolds by the Duke of Leeds in exchange for a Reynolds self-portrait. Reynolds thought it to be the real painting and the French one a copy, which has now been disproved. It is, however, useful in that it was copied when the original's colors were far brighter than they are now, and so it gives some sense of the original's appearance 'as new'. It is held in the stores of the Dulwich Picture Gallery. There are also copies of the image in which the figure appears nude. These have also led to speculation that they were copied from a lost Leonardo original depicting Lisa naked |
|
romeo615
71 posts |
#22374 2007-09-14 03:36 GMT |
|
It is a beautiful painting and perhaps because it was painted by Leonardo Da Vinci it's famous, but quite frankly i had a good look, as far as you can and thought what's all the fuss about. It's her enigmatic look that gets everyone talking, what was in her mind when she was being painted. Mind you if someone would donate it to me i wouldn't argue!!
|
|
Sarah
54 posts |
#22375 2007-09-14 03:41 GMT |
|
ha ha ha.what a actress......
|
|
anim8it
76 posts |
#22376 2007-09-14 03:42 GMT |
|
she's famous for her crooked smile--this puzzled artists because they couldnt figure out her emotions. Plus it was painted by one of the greatest painters in the world--Da Vinci but I guess you already knew that.
But I found something out from CNN.com. They seem to have decoded Mona Lisa's smile using a computer program scientists have created. "The findings--Mona lisa was 83 % happy, 9% disgusted, 6% fearful and 2% angry according to British weekly 'New Scientist'." But no one knew what made her feel that way. |
|
TochaTocha
32 posts |
#22377 2007-09-14 03:44 GMT |
|
According to my friend Carol Ivory, there are probably a number of reasons. Professor Ivory is an art historian. She focuses her research mostly on the art of the Marquesas Islands, which are part of French Polynesia, which sounds like an excellent thing to focus on. But she also knows something about the Mona Lisa.
You probably realize there was a lot going on around the time when Leonardo da Vinci painted the Mona Lisa. We think he painted it in Italy sometime between 1503 and 1506. This was the height of what we call the RENAISSANCE, which was a time when all sorts of new thinking in art and science was happening in Europe. It would have been a very interesting time to live. At the same time Leonardo was busy painting the Mona Lisa, Columbus was on his last voyage, to Honduras and Panama. Also, Amerigo Vespucci took his second voyage to South America, where he figured out that it was a separate continent and not linked to India. Maybe we still don't know what Mona Lisa is thinking, but at least we know something about the Renaissance. Other great artists who were working at the time included Michelangelo, Raphael, Titian, and Durer. Just a few years later, Copernicus figured out that the Earth and planets revolve around the Sun. But back to Leonardo! Leonardo was one sharp guy. Not only was he a painter and inventor, he was a big-time mountain climber. And a good singer. Only thing, says Professor Ivory, he was long on ideas, but short on execution. In other words, he actually didn't finish all that many paintings, only about 30 or so. Now admittedly, that's 30 more than I've done. The point is, however, that the Mona Lisa did get finished, and it's really good. Leonardo himself must have thought it was pretty good. When he moved from Italy to France, where he was summoned just to keep the king company, he took the painting along. This actually wasn't that big of a deal. The painting itself is not all that big. It's measures only about 31inches by 21 inches. In fact, a lot of people are disappointed when they see the real thing at the Louvre in Paris. There it is behind a big sheet of glass and surrounded by eight million people, all trying to get a look at this little dinky painting. Professor Ivory suggests if you go to the Louvre and are interested in Leonardo, check out his less famous paintings. But back to the question. What makes it so appealing? Even if you are completely art-deprived, you still probably are familiar with the Mona Lisa. You see her on olive oil bottles and all sorts of things, and lots of other artists have borrowed her image and changed it around. For example, in 1919 Marcel Duchamp painted a moustache on her. You're probably thinking, I could have done that. You're right, you could, but Marcel beat you to it. Anyway, sometimes it seems everywhere you look, there's the Mona Lisa! But why? Most paintings of people before Leonardo were very stiff and formal. The people were either heroes or goddesses or some other sort of bigshot. Often they were painted in profile, which means from the side. Not only is Mona Lisa an ordinary person (she was probably married to a local businessman), she's looking right at you. And then there's THE SMILE. Everybody talks about how odd her smile is. Well, I don't think it's all that odd. But it's certainly intriguing. Here she is staring right at us and smiling that little smile, like SHE KNOWS SOMETHING. So what does she know? Some people have guessed that she was pregnant. Or that maybe she and Leonardo were a little too friendly. But their ideas are worth about as much as yours and mine. And truth is, according to Vasari, who lived at the same time as Leonardo, the painter hired musicians and "buffoons" to entertain Mona Lisa while he painted her. Hardly anybody ever smiled in earlier paintings, and he was determined to do something different! Leonardo's painting changed the way portraits were done, says Professor Ivory. He got into her personality and MAKES us wonder what she's thinking. That, plus the kind of technique he used (called sfumato) to make the painting look soft and comfortable, PLUS the beautiful lighting, is why we like it so much. And that's about it! |
|
Style
37 posts |
#22378 2007-09-14 03:49 GMT |
|
I always thought Mona Lisa can be a man. Like an early day drag queen. That's why she's sooo interesting to look.
|
|
Style
37 posts |
#22379 2007-09-14 03:57 GMT |
|
when da vinci painted the mona lisa, his life was in a turmoil, the study,the pose the ubiquitous smile is not was the norm, it was unique,and still is in some respects less than a4 size it was neither a miniture or a usual portrait size,some say that the louvre lisa is only a small sectional study of a full size version that da vinci was copmpleting and that one or many of his apprentices had a hand in the smaller study, however no large version of this painting has yet been discovered,which all adds to the perception of the work in the public arena, like many that have answered this question, i too have studied the work and it is a wonderful inspiring piece of art, if you ignore the monetary value that we bestow on art that is considered 'unique' as a tool of learning it is priceless. regards LF
|
|
mayumi
28 posts |
#22380 2007-09-14 04:23 GMT |
|
If I was you I would open my eyes, the whys are so evident.
|
|
VanGoghsEar
109 posts |
#22381 2007-09-14 04:53 GMT |
|
I don't understand why it's so famous. There are other pictures by Leonardo which I prefer (The Madonna of the rokcs, for instance).
To me the Mona Lisa is just a rather ordinary looking woman who is staring out of the canvas with a rather sarcastic smile. |
|
BadIan
50 posts |
#22382 2007-09-14 08:46 GMT |
|
Is a professor somewhere giving this as a research project? I just answered this question for someone else. Here it is again:
I think saying it is the best representation of Renaissance painting may be debatable, however it is surely one of the most famous. Oil painting was a relatively new medium for Italian artists at that time and it offered an opportunity to create images that were not as flat looking as tempera paintings or frescoes. Tempera used egg yolk as a binder and was painted on a wooden support. Frescoes were painted in wet plaster directly on a wall. Oil surrounds the pigment in a clear binder that allows the pigment to "float" above the support. Oil paint can be layered over and over still leaving traces of the layer below - these layers are called glazes. The glazing in the background of the Mona Lisa is part of what makes the Mona Lisa so important because it creates an illusion of "atmospheric space." Leonardo worked on that painting for years and applied layer over layer not only in the background but on the figure as well - that's why it seems so three-dimensional. Of course part of what makes it so famous is the mystery behind it - Who was she? Why did he paint her? Is it a self-portrait? Why did he carry this around with him for years... Wait a minute...Why am I helping you do your homework? |
|
BadIan
50 posts |
#22383 2007-09-14 12:28 GMT |
|
It's been rumoured that Leonardo was so attached to it that he couldn't go anywhere without it - that it was his favourite painting. There's also the issue of the model; again, it's been said that she is actually Leonardo in female form, although it's more likely that it was the wife of a wealthy Florentine merchant, Lisa Gherardini. Also she was well known for her enigmatic smile, which is quite ambiguous. Technically speaking, it is a brilliant portrait - his pioneering use of sfumato (smoky, making the lines blend into each other easily) and chiaroscuro (light and dark, shadows) made it famous in his own lifetime. Of course, with the Da Vinci Code, it's become even more famous.
|
|
MazMaz
42 posts |
#22384 2007-09-14 18:46 GMT |
|
because of the technique called "perspective"....and hey, with the right "perspective" life get's quite interesting too!
|
|
Jordan
45 posts |
#22385 2007-09-14 20:27 GMT |
|
I can't add more information than you have already had in the previous answers. I will add that it is all the innovative techniques that are evident that make it iconic for art historians. Da vinci's life is so wrapped up in its history especially bearing in mind, as was previously commented, that it was his favourite painting. That evidently raises so many questions. And the enigma of the smile! Surely it makes you want to know. I think a painting that can evoke such a reaction is hugely important, added to the skill and technique. I love and hate it equally (It's disappointingly small-I think that is because it is so powerful I wanted it to be bigger). I wish I could see it as it was originally painted (it has apparently been trimmed since it was-maybe that's neither here nor there but it's all part of the mystery. I love a mystery.)
|
|
JohnnyKnox
43 posts |
#22386 2007-09-15 06:38 GMT |
|
It's said that Monna Elisa (the Lady Elisa) was in mourning, which explains the clothes and the fine black veil she is wearing. The last thing she wanted was to have her portrait taken, but for whatever reason, she had to sit for it. She was depressed and refused to smile so Da Vinci had an acrobat brought in to entertain her. At some point the acrobat fell down and this brought the small smile seen in the portrait.
There's something wistful and sweet about her expression. |
|






















