![]() |
Forums / Art Talk / Painting Talk / why do the women in Peter Paul Ruben's paintings looked so plump?
> 1 <
| Author | Message |
anim8it
76 posts |
#23163 2007-09-21 13:30 GMT |
|
http://www.artchive.com/artchive/r/rubens/rubens_leucippus.jpg
here is a painting of his so you understand what i mean |
|
CaptainCrunch
46 posts |
#23164 2007-09-21 13:35 GMT |
|
that was what was considered as idealistic or beautiful back then.
|
|
vevrca
80 posts |
#23165 2007-09-21 13:41 GMT |
|
because back then it wasn't fashionalbe to be thin it ment that you were poor, lack of eating and all. They were healthy. The fat the man the richer he was. that and think about it. US is one of the countries that focuses on being thin, working long hours and not enjoying life now. Europe for example, they work hard but they also know when to quick and enjoy life today. And they eat.
|
|
HahaYouNoob
23 posts |
#23166 2007-09-21 13:41 GMT |
|
because the most beautiful women of the time were plump. they idealized things like wealth and the ability to feed yourself. also in Renaissance Italy a plump woman was considered good for producing healthy sons. it has actually survived in Italian thought and culture somewhat to this day.
|
|
Kea
45 posts |
#23167 2007-09-21 23:36 GMT |
|
Until the 20th century, people labored hard. The work of survival meant one had to be very strong and was usually also very tanned from being outdoors. The diet was simple and there wasn't a lot of food to go around -- just enough to exist, so they were muscular and lean and tan. Today we call that healthy, but then it was a telling sign that a person was from the common working class. People who were at the top of society stayed indoors more, so their skin was very white, they did a lot of social eating and had a variety of food, so they were well-fed, and they didn't have to labor, so the calories they consumed went to fat. A woman who had radiantly healthy pink skin and a nice handful of flab was a turn-on. One had to be rich to look like that.
|
|
SpongeBob
39 posts |
#23168 2007-09-22 08:31 GMT |
|
Have you ever heard of the term 'Rubenesque'? This is where that comes from. Most of these women were beautiful...but back then, there was a 'happy-medium' as well. If they were too large, they were considered grotesque. The women in his paintings had "just the right amount of flesh".
|
|
> 1 <










